Skip links
Pillow block vs flange bearing explained

Pillow block vs flange bearing explained

The Practical and Hygienic Guide for Modern Production

Learn the real-world difference between pillow block and flange bearing units—mounting, loads, hygiene, materials, certifications, and selection tips—plus four industry cases and trusted manufacturer insights.

In fast-moving production environments—especially food, beverage, dairy, pharma, and packaging—mounted bearing units are small components with huge consequences. The right choice can reduce downtime, simplify cleaning, and support hygienic compliance. The wrong choice can turn washdown into corrosion, misalignment into premature failure, and routine maintenance into unplanned stops.

Product Line Contact

What’s the difference: pillow block vs flange bearing units?

Pillow block units (also called plummer blocks in many contexts) mount on a base surface and support a shaft that runs parallel to that mounting plane. They are commonly used on conveyor shafts, rollers, and line-shaft supports where you have space for a base and want straightforward alignment and service access.

Flange bearing units mount to a vertical or side surface (a wall, frame, machine plate, gearbox face, etc.) and support a shaft that passes through that surface. They shine when your machine layout forces a compact, face-mounted design or when you need a stable side-mounted support.

In hygienic environments, the differences go beyond geometry: flange units can reduce footprint and eliminate extra support brackets, while pillow blocks can offer easier access for inspection and faster changeouts—depending on guarding and washdown routines.


Usage: when each unit typically wins

When pillow block units are the better fit

  • Long conveyor runs and line shafts where mounting rails and base plates are easy to fabricate and align.

  • Heavier radial loads (common on belt conveyors with tension, large pulleys, or side loads).

  • Maintenance-friendly layouts where technicians want fast access to bolts, seals, and covers.

  • Retrofits where you’re replacing existing base-mounted housings with minimal redesign.

heavy duty pillow block bearing solutions

When flange units are the better fit

  • Compact machine frames where base mounting is limited (fillers, carton formers, compact transfer modules).

  • Through-wall or through-frame shaft support where the bearing must mount to a plate or side wall.

  • Precise face mounting for repeatable positioning and minimal bracketry.

  • Tight guarding zones where a smaller envelope reduces interference.

flange bearing units for food industry lines


Industries: what hygiene, environment, and loads change

Food & beverage (wet washdown and chemical exposure)

Hygienic design is not a “nice-to-have” here—it’s a contamination control strategy. EHEDG highlights that poorly designed equipment is difficult to clean and increases contamination risk.
In these environments, the “bearing choice” is often really a sealing + housing + lubrication choice, with mounting style (pillow block vs flange) following the machine layout.

Dairy (high cleaning frequency, uptime pressure)

Dairy plants frequently combine aggressive cleaning with high runtime expectations, which punishes weak seals and poor material choices. USDA dairy equipment guidelines reference 3-A SSI standards and emphasize sanitation evaluation as part of acceptance and inspection expectations.

Meat & poultry (extreme washdown, high-risk zones)

These lines often run high-pressure, high-temperature cleaning, with proteins/fats that cling to surfaces. Hygienic geometry (drainable shapes, minimal crevices) and robust sealing matter as much as bearing size.

Pharmaceuticals and biotech (controlled cleanliness, often dry or controlled wash)

While washdown may be less aggressive than food, pharma prioritizes contamination control and reliable, repeatable machine performance. Layout constraints frequently push designers toward flange mounting on compact modules.

pillow block vs flange bearing explained


Materials: what changes between standard, corrosion-resistant, and hygienic designs

Housing materials

  • Cast iron (standard industrial): cost-effective, common in dry environments; often unsuitable for harsh washdown.

  • Stainless steel housings: chosen for corrosion resistance and cleanability, especially in wet zones.

  • Polymer/composite housings (food-focused): can offer chemical resistance and avoid corrosion; some designs focus on hygienic geometry and drainage. A case study on SKF Food Line notes reinforced polypropylene housings selected for chemical resistance and dimensional stability.
    Timken also positions housings available in polymer or stainless steel for corrosion-resistant housed units used in harsh conditions.

Insert/bearing materials and corrosion resistance

Food/washdown-focused solutions frequently use corrosion-resistant stainless inserts. The SKF Food Line case study references an insert with AISI grade 420 stainless steel components for corrosion resistance.
NSK’s food and beverage bearing literature emphasizes designs with rust-proof materials, sealed construction, and food-compatible lubricants.

Lubrication: food-grade matters

If a bearing sits near open product, lubricant compliance becomes part of risk control. NSF explains that H1 registrations are for lubricants suitable where incidental food contact may occur (and are widely used to demonstrate “food grade” status).


Experience: 4 cases that show how the decision plays out

Case 1 — Milk bottling conveyor: stopping water ingress failures (pillow block style units)

A UK milk processing plant faced frequent bearing failures and limited ability to re-lubricate due to inaccessible positions. After identifying water ingress and corrosion as the root cause, a switch to stainless, washdown-suited bearing units reportedly extended service life dramatically and delivered savings (listed as £32,700 over 5 years with a payback of 7.5 months).
Takeaway: In washdown conveyors, the “unit type” matters less than sealing and corrosion strategy—but pillow block layouts often remain the easiest to service on long conveyors.

Case 2 — Canning conveyor washdown: reducing replacements and improving hygiene (hygienic mounted units)

A food & beverage canning-site case study describes repeated washdowns driving lubrication and seal problems, leading to premature replacements. The same study reports actual savings of £44,240 and highlights hygienic geometry aligned to EHEDG guidance, plus reduced washdown time and higher sanitation.
Takeaway: Hygienic geometry and sealing can turn washdown from a failure driver into a controllable routine—whether you mount as pillow block or flange depends on the frame, but the hygienic design principles stay the same.

Case 3 — Poultry cut-up line: compact framing pushes flange mounting

On compact stainless frames, designers often prefer two-bolt or four-bolt flange units because they reduce brackets and keep shafts supported through panels. In high-pressure washdown zones, this layout can also minimize horizontal ledges where residues collect—provided the flange housing geometry is drainable and seals are truly washdown-rated.
Takeaway: Choose flange when space and face-mount stability matter—then specify hygienic geometry, stainless hardware, and validated sealing.

Case 4 — Packaging line near open product: balancing cleanliness and speed of changeover

In dry packaging areas, the dominant risk is often dust/particulate plus frequent changeovers. Pillow blocks may win because technicians can swap units quickly, especially when guards and access are designed around base mounting. But flange units can win on compact cartoners and transfer modules.
Takeaway: In dry zones, the decision often becomes “service access vs footprint”—and both can be safe if materials and lubrication match the risk profile.


Expertise: leading manufacturers and what they emphasize

When you evaluate “best practice,” it helps to see what major bearing makers build for hygienic industries:

  • SKF publishes food & beverage case studies around Food Line bearing units and hygiene-focused designs.

  • NSK offers food & beverage bearing ranges emphasizing sealed construction, corrosion resistance, and the option for USDA H1-certified lubricants.

  • Timken markets corrosion-resistant hygienic housed units designed to withstand aggressive washdowns and support food safety goals, including stainless and polymer options and food-grade lubrication approaches.

  • Schaeffler (FAG/INA) provides product information for food-industry bearing solutions including radial insert units and housing concepts suitable for washdown and food-related media exposure.

Bottom line: the “best” pillow block or flange unit is usually the one that’s purpose-built for your environment (washdown level, chemical exposure, contamination risk), not the one that’s merely the right shape.


Authoritativeness: certifications and standards that signal hygienic credibility

In hygienic production, you’re not just buying a bearing—you’re buying risk reduction and audit resilience. Look for alignment with:

  • EHEDG hygienic design principles, which emphasize cleanability and contamination prevention in equipment design.

  • EHEDG equipment certification database, which publicly lists certified equipment and certificates.

  • ISO 14159 (hygiene requirements for machinery design), a recognized standard for hygienic risk contexts.

  • EN 1672-2 (food processing machinery—hygiene and cleanability requirements).

  • 3-A Sanitary Standards, which define criteria for design/fabrication of equipment contacting food and are widely used in dairy and sanitary equipment contexts.


Trustworthiness: what “customer testimony” looks like in bearings

The most credible testimonials are specific and measurable—downtime reduced, service life extended, savings quantified, cleaning time reduced.

  • A dairy conveyor example reports multi-year service life and £32,700 savings over five years after addressing water ingress with washdown-suited units.

  • A canning conveyor case reports £44,240 savings and highlights hygiene and cleaning improvements tied to unit design and sealing.

These are the kinds of outcomes to request from suppliers: case studies, test conditions, and real maintenance metrics—not just catalog claims.


Quick selection checklist: choose with confidence

  1. Mounting constraint: Do you have a base surface (pillow block) or a face/plate (flange)?

  2. Load direction: Mostly radial (often pillow block) or combined with axial/space constraints (often flange)?

  3. Environment: dry, splash, or full washdown with chemicals?

  4. Seal strategy: multi-lip seals, back seals, end covers—validated for your cleaning routine.

  5. Material set: housing + insert + fasteners must match corrosion and chemical exposure.

  6. Lubrication compliance: NSF H1 / ISO 21469-aligned lubricants when incidental contact risk exists.

  7. Hygienic design alignment: EHEDG/ISO/EN principles and documentation readiness.

pillow block bearing units in stainless steel

Pillow block vs flange bearing explained
Pillow block vs flange bearing explained
Pillow block bearing units in stainless steel

Contact

    Articles

    Understanding Machinery Components & Protection Standards

    347 words

    Industrial machinery requires precision-engineered components that meet exacting standards for durability, safety, and performance. This comprehensive guide explores the essential machinery parts that drive modern manufacturing across food processing, packaging, and chemical industries. Understanding the difference between Plummer Blocks and Flange Mounted Units is crucial for engineers and procurement professionals seeking to optimize equipment longevity. Pillow block bearings, also known as plummer blocks, are self-aligning bearing units that simplify installation and significantly reduce maintenance costs. These versatile components mount on machine frames and support rotating shafts with exceptional precision, ensuring smooth operation in demanding industrial environments. Flange bearing units offer a more compact alternative, featuring integrated flanges that enable direct mounting to flat surfaces without additional hardware. Both designs come in various materials, including stainless steel grades optimized for corrosive environments and food-grade applications where hygiene is paramount. The importance of material selection cannot be overstated in machinery design. 440C Steel and 420 grades offer distinctly different properties suited to specific applications and environmental conditions. The 440 stainless steel variant provides superior hardness and exceptional edge retention, making it ideal for cutting tools and high-wear applications requiring maximum durability. Meanwhile, 420 stainless steel offers better corrosion resistance and is preferred in food processing equipment where chemical exposure is common. Hygienic stainless steel components have become essential in food machinery, meeting EHEDG standards and facilitating rapid equipment cleaning required in modern food production facilities. Understanding ingress protection ratings is equally critical for machinery durability and operational reliability. IP67 rating ensures protection against dust and temporary water immersion, while IP68 rating provides complete dust protection and sustained water immersion capabilities for submerged operations. The IP69K standard represents the highest protection level, specifically designed for high-pressure wash-down environments found in industrial food processing facilities. These ratings define how effectively machinery components withstand environmental challenges and maintain performance. Modern industrial facilities increasingly demand equipment that combines high performance with ease of maintenance and sanitation. The choice between different bearing types depends on operational requirements, environmental conditions, and budget constraints. Proper component selection ensures extended equipment lifespan, reduced downtime, and improved operational efficiency.